Ian-Deavall-Prevention-of-Future-Deaths-Report-2024-0485

REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:
1. HM Prison & Probation Service
2. Ministry of Justice
1

CORONER
I am Bronia Hartley, Assistant Coroner for the coronial area of Greater
Manchester West.

2

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS
I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and
Justice Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations)
Regulations 2013.

3

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST
On 26 January 2023 I commenced an investigation into the death of Ian
William Deavall, age 65. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest
on 9 September 2024.
The conclusion of the inquest was:
Ian William Deavall died as a consequence of a naturally occurring
cardiac arrest. There was an admitted failure to arrange for Mr
Deavall to be sent to hospital for assessment between 20 and 24
January 2023, however this did not cause or contribute to death on
the balance of probabilities.
The medical cause of death was:
1. Ischaemic heart disease.

4

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH
The Deceased was remanded in custody to HMP Forest Bank on 7 January
2023. He had a known history of ischaemic heart disease and hypotension
and was prescribed various medications for the same. The Deceased was
housed on the induction wing throughout his time at the prison and shared a
cell. Both the Deceased and his cell mate were believed to be at risk from
other prisoners and were classed as vulnerable prisoners (‘VPs’) accordingly.
The inquest heard evidence that both VPs and non-VPs are housed on the
induction wing and that the recognised risk to VP prisoners when co-located

1

with non-VP prisoners is managed by operating two separate regimes to avoid
the two demographics coming into contact with one another.
On 24 January 2023 the Deceased and his cell mate were locked in their cell
when the Deceased suffered a cardiac arrest. His cell mate pressed the
emergency cell bell whereupon a non-VP prisoner (‘Prisoner A’), who was
unlocked and conversing with two other prisoners on the landing adjacent to
the Deceased’s cell, deactivated the cell bell on the panel outside the cell
before resuming his conversation with the other prisoners. After
approximately 1 minute Prisoner A walked down to the wing office and
alerted officers inside, following which a medical emergency response was
initiated.
The inquest heard evidence that when an emergency cell bell in the induction
wing at HMP Forest Bank is deactivated on the panel outside the cell (i) this
cancels the alert in the wing office; (ii) the only means by which staff can
ascertain in which exact cell the emergency cell bell has been activated (the
light on the panel outside the cell) goes off.
5

CORONER’S CONCERNS

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to
concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless
action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.
The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follow:
(1) The response to a medical emergency will generally be time critical.
(2) The risk that non-VP prisoners will victimise VP prisoners is a
recognised one.
(3) That prison staff became aware of the medical emergency in the
Deceased’s case was more by accident than design (depending as it
did on the caprice of Prisoner A).
There remains a risk that future deaths could occur as it remains the case
that emergency cell bells at HMP Forest Bank can be deactivated readily and
altogether by other prisoners and no action to implement fail-safe measures is
currently proposed.
6

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN
In my opinion urgent action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I
believe your organisations have the power to take such action.

7

YOUR RESPONSE
You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of
this report, namely by 4 November 2024. I, the coroner, may extend the
period.

2

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken,
setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no
action is proposed.
8

COPIES and PUBLICATION
I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following
Interested Persons: the Family of Mr Deavall, Sodexo Justice Services,
Spectrum Community Health CIC and Med-Co Secure Health Services Ltd.
I have also sent it to the Prison and Probation Ombudsman and HMI Prisons
who may find it useful or of interest.
I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner.
I may also send a copy of your response to any other person who I believe
may find it useful or of interest.
The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or
summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he
believes may find it useful or of interest.
You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your
response, about the release or the publication of your response.

9

Date 9 September 2024

Signed BRONIA HARTLEY
Assistant Coroner for Greater
Manchester West

3

Back to top of the page